采用TimerTask的方式无法定时定点，quartz就更灵活一些了。

TestBean.java

package cn.joypen.spring.demo2.bean;
/**
测试bean
@author JOYPEN
@email user.zhaopeng@qq.com
@webSite htt://joypen.cn
@time 2010-7-22 下午07:53:38
 /
public class TestBean {
 private String name = "joypen";
 public String getName() {
 return name;
 }
 public void setName(String name) {
 this.name = name;
 }
}

package cn.joypen.spring.demo2.service;
import org.quartz.JobExecutionContext;
import org.quartz.JobExecutionException;
import org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.QuartzJobBean;
import cn.joypen.spring.demo2.bean.TestBean;
import cn.joypen.spring.demo2.dao.iface.ITestDao;
/*
测试类
@author JOYPEN
@email user.zhaopeng@qq.com
@webSite htt://joypen.cn
@time 2010-7-22 下午07:52:37
 */
public class TestService extends QuartzJobBean {
 private TestBean testBean;
 //必须集成QuartzJobBean 的executeInternal的方式
 @Override
 protected void executeInternal(JobExecutionContext arg0) throws JobExecutionException {
 System.out.println(testBean.getName());
 }
 public TestBean getTestBean() {
 return testBean;
 }
 public void setTestBean(TestBean testBean) {
 this.testBean = testBean;
 }
}

applicationContext.xml

     class="org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.JobDetailBean">     cn.joypen.spring.demo2.service.TestService     class="org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.CronTriggerBean">     0/5 * * * * ?     class="org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.SchedulerFactoryBean">



quartz也可以采用org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.SimpleTriggerBean的方式，功能与TimerTask类似，好处在于不需要将注入的文件写出来，也就是因为这个原因，我搞了一天，才发现原因。要采用例子的方式，必须要加入。